flyswatter
Member
Hi folks, I'm fairly new around here so don't know whether this topic has been covered recently.
Since buying my first SG -- a 2011 Special Faded -- a couple of months ago it seems that every other guitar I pick up (including my own Tele, Strat and LP copy) is less easy to play in terms of action, feel, string bending, fluid solos, etc. I use similar strings on all my guitars (Gibson or D'Addario 10s - 46s) and set up the action for similar playability -- but the SG wins out everytime.
I thought at first it might be the shorter scale than a Fender -- but my LP is the same scale, as was an LTD Viper SG-type copy I sold when I got my Gibson. Neither comes close to the SG in feel.
The bridge doesn't account for it, because my Strat is setup with a 3-spring floating trem which dips forward when I bend strings, so logically ought to feel lighter than the fixed tune-o-matic on an SG -- yet doesn't.
I'm not claiming that "easier" action is always better... certainly there are times when I prefer the extra "dig" of the strings on a Tele -- especially when playing chunky rhythm stuff -- and the "stiffer" LP is unquestionably the stabler guitar for slide solos.
But when it comes to anything requiring finesse, string bending, and lightness of touch, the SG is undeniably the winner.
So, my question for members is: What accounts for the ease of playability of an SG?
Since buying my first SG -- a 2011 Special Faded -- a couple of months ago it seems that every other guitar I pick up (including my own Tele, Strat and LP copy) is less easy to play in terms of action, feel, string bending, fluid solos, etc. I use similar strings on all my guitars (Gibson or D'Addario 10s - 46s) and set up the action for similar playability -- but the SG wins out everytime.
I thought at first it might be the shorter scale than a Fender -- but my LP is the same scale, as was an LTD Viper SG-type copy I sold when I got my Gibson. Neither comes close to the SG in feel.
The bridge doesn't account for it, because my Strat is setup with a 3-spring floating trem which dips forward when I bend strings, so logically ought to feel lighter than the fixed tune-o-matic on an SG -- yet doesn't.
I'm not claiming that "easier" action is always better... certainly there are times when I prefer the extra "dig" of the strings on a Tele -- especially when playing chunky rhythm stuff -- and the "stiffer" LP is unquestionably the stabler guitar for slide solos.
But when it comes to anything requiring finesse, string bending, and lightness of touch, the SG is undeniably the winner.
So, my question for members is: What accounts for the ease of playability of an SG?